Today was quite an impressive day. It started out with a leading French historian, Henry Rousso, who has written many books on the subject of World War II and after. We are using a book of his called
Vichy Syndrome which deals with the function of memory and how the French have come to terms with their past especially the collaboration with the Nazi Regime. His insights were pretty fascinating and certainly gave me a lot to think about as I reflect on how these events transpired in a country that for hundreds of years has been considered the bastion of culture and civilization.
This afternoon was to top off the day with a journalist, Annette Levy-Willard, who is an editor and journalist for Liberation, a newspaper known for its leftist leanings (http://www.liberation.fr/) . She was recruited by Jean-Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir for this job which is, in and of itself, fascinating to me. She was the first to interview a Vichy official, Maurice Papon, who was finally brought to justice for his crimes in the nineties. This event was extremely important in the struggle for France to finally realize and come to terms with some of its ugly past. Papon was an official in the government namely the Bordeaux region. He single handedly signed off on documents approving the arrest and deportation of Jews in the region and actively seeking those in hiding. Annette describes him as well-behaved and quite slick, however he was not an anti-semite. He originally denied that he even signed these documents and eventually stopped this claim. One of the most striking pieces that Annette shared was the fact that Papon flatly insisted that he was just doing his job and he would do it again.
Papon almost escaped prosecution by claiming that he saved over 100 Jews. His contention was that he crossed their names off of the list. Annette and the lawyer prosecuting this crime uncovered important details that in no uncertain terms refuted Papon's claims. Yes, he crossed the names off of the list, however these names should never have been there in the first place because they were not Jews. For example, it was discovered that one of the names on the list that was crossed was identified as Jewish but that was only her married name. Papon was actually doing as the rule required because these people did not meet the requirements set forth by the Nazi Regime.
In the end, it all comes down again to the concept of indifference. Papon could have done something but due to his desires as a technocrat, he was blinded by ambition. All of the people that he had arrested and eventually deported perished at Auschwitz. Indifference seems to be a dangerous tool wherever exercised.